On 4/28/2013 1:57 PM, Mary wrote:
> Okay - I think I figured it out!
>
> Here it is to anyone who stumbles upon this thread looking to make data
> from different vectors the same size for analysis:
...
> essentially interp1, should work
> especially if things are normalized afterward to compare magnitudes
>
...
Well, given your first posting said "Creating equal time lengths between
the 5 sets isn't an option ..." you've kinda' changed the playing field
on us. :(
Again, I'd ask however what it actually means if you shorten/length the
measured data...what does time have to do with what one is after if it
is skewed to artificially matchup data? Or, iow, is there any point in
keeping anything except some maximum angle achieved by any subject
irrespective of the time? It's all a puzzle w/o knowing anything more
than has been supplied to cs-sm.
--
> Okay - I think I figured it out!
>
> Here it is to anyone who stumbles upon this thread looking to make data
> from different vectors the same size for analysis:
...
> essentially interp1, should work
> especially if things are normalized afterward to compare magnitudes
>
...
Well, given your first posting said "Creating equal time lengths between
the 5 sets isn't an option ..." you've kinda' changed the playing field
on us. :(
Again, I'd ask however what it actually means if you shorten/length the
measured data...what does time have to do with what one is after if it
is skewed to artificially matchup data? Or, iow, is there any point in
keeping anything except some maximum angle achieved by any subject
irrespective of the time? It's all a puzzle w/o knowing anything more
than has been supplied to cs-sm.
--